Sun. Nov. 18, 2012:
Gentle Readers, there are 2 points today.
One is my own, because I haven't seen this obvious comparison anywhere else.
The other is a GEM forwarded from an Australian.
DO NOT MISS IT. SCROLL BABY SCROLL!
Perhaps Texas's current petition to secede,
along with several other Red States, gets seen from a fresh angle, Down Under.
I.
Back in 2002, Liberals were a bit unfair to use 20/20 hindsight, to pile on George W. Bush for not foreseeing 9/11, for not understanding the significance of prior warnings -- which always seem so clear in retrospect.
I am no fan of GWB, but even back in 2001-2002, I felt Lib critiques sounded like
Monday Morning Quarterbacking for partisan purposes.
For the histoire-minded, check out similar scathings against FDR after Pearl Harbor.
"How could he not have seen it coming! Intercepted codes, blah blah blah!"
And what we have now is simply another chapter, Benghazi-style. Yes, balls were dropped everywhere! But for Lindsay Graham & John McCain to lead the charge in blaming Benghazi on Obama, Hillary, and Susan Rice seems just as nonsensical as the previous critiques of 1941 and 2001.
As Bob Schieffer repeatedly asked on this morning's "Face the Nation,"
Why did Chris Stevens, our U.S. Ambassador to Libya, who was more attuned to Benghazi Intelligence than anyone, go into his office, on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 no less, when he must have known -- far better than leaders thousands of miles away, like Obama or Hillary or Susan Rice -- how little security there was?!?
Pro-American Benghazi Citizens Attempting to Rescue U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens
II. AND NOW, FROM THE LAND DOWN UNDER, WHERE WOMEN GLOW, AND MEN CHUNDER:
Subject: Red vs Blue
Dear Red States:
We're ticked off at your Neanderthal attitudes and politics, so we've decided
we're leaving.
We in California intend to form our own country and we're taking the other Blue
States with us.
In case you aren't aware that includes Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois-- and most of the Northeast.
We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation and especially to the
people of the new country of The Enlightened States of America (E.S.A).
To sum up briefly:
You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states.
We get stem cell research and the best beaches.
We get Andrew Cuomo and Elizabeth Warren. You get Bobby Jindal and Todd Akin.
We get the Statue of Liberty. You get OpryLand.
We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom.
We get Harvard. You get Ol' Miss.
We get 85 per cent of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs.
You get Alabama.
We get two-thirds of the tax revenue. You get to make the red states pay their
fair share.
Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 per cent lower than the Christian
Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families.
With the Blue States in hand we will have firm control of 80% of the
country's fresh water, more than 90% of the pineapple and lettuce, 92%
of the nation's fresh fruit, 95% of America's quality wines (you can
serve French wines at state dinners) 90% of all cheese, 90 per cent of
the high tech industry, most of the US low sulphur coal, all living
redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools
plus Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT.
With the Red States you will have to cope with 88% of all obese
Americans and their projected health care costs, 92% of all US
mosquitoes, nearly 100% of the tornadoes, 90% of the hurricanes, 99% of
all Southern Baptists, virtually 100% of all televangelists, Rush
Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.
We get Hollywood and Yosemite.
38% of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually swallowed by
a whale, 62% believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death
penalty or gun laws, 44% say that evolution is only a theory, 53% that
Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61% of you crazy bastards believe you
are people with higher morals then we lefties.
We're taking the good weed too. You can have that crap they grow in Mexico.
Sincerely,
Citizen of the Enlightened States of America
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The Best of a Great Week in the Media
Wed. Nov. 14, 2012:
O Worthy Readers, sit back. Enjoy a few superb nuggets from this past week.
1. (One never seen anywhere before JFK+MM. Is it photoshopped?!?)
O Worthy Readers, sit back. Enjoy a few superb nuggets from this past week.
1. (One never seen anywhere before JFK+MM. Is it photoshopped?!?)
2. Conservative David Frum channels Howard Cosell, and "Tells It Like It Is":
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/12/opinion/frum-conservatives-despair/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
3. Cheer up, G.O.P. voters: Obama is actually a moderate Republican! Really!
http://www.slate.com/articles/ news_and_politics/frame_game/ 2012/11/obama_the_moderate_ republican_what_the_2012_ election_should_teach_the_gop. html
4. On the other hand, maybe the G.O.P. outlook for the next 4 years is bleak indeed:
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-07/obamas-holding-the-cards
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/12/opinion/frum-conservatives-despair/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
3. Cheer up, G.O.P. voters: Obama is actually a moderate Republican! Really!
http://www.slate.com/articles/
4. On the other hand, maybe the G.O.P. outlook for the next 4 years is bleak indeed:
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-07/obamas-holding-the-cards
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Needing a Martian Invasion: "War of the Worlds"
Tues. Nov. 13, 2012:
Dear Readers, post-election days have brought a bonanza of great stuff.
But this item, below, may be the cream of the crop, for those of us wanting Red & Blue States to
join sides, for once.
OUTSTANDING ARTICLE, BY JONATHAN HAIDT!
Instead of seceding [as 8 states have started petitions to do] -- PREDICTED, one might boast
by this very site, some gazillion posts ago [wazzit April 2012?] -- why not look to a common enemy,
and unite against it?
Martians, invade! War of the Worlds, Commence!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/opinion/after-the-election-fear-is-our-only-chance-at-unity.html?pagewanted=all
Dear Readers, post-election days have brought a bonanza of great stuff.
But this item, below, may be the cream of the crop, for those of us wanting Red & Blue States to
join sides, for once.
OUTSTANDING ARTICLE, BY JONATHAN HAIDT!
Instead of seceding [as 8 states have started petitions to do] -- PREDICTED, one might boast
by this very site, some gazillion posts ago [wazzit April 2012?] -- why not look to a common enemy,
and unite against it?
Martians, invade! War of the Worlds, Commence!
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/opinion/after-the-election-fear-is-our-only-chance-at-unity.html?pagewanted=all
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Avenged vs. "The Turtle" Mitch McConnell
Thu. Nov. 8, 2012:
Faithful readers of Bitesfromedwin will remember one strand in particular, during the long buildup since all the way back to last January, up to Nov. 6's election:
U.S. Senator from Kentucky and Senate Minority Leader for the Republicans, Mitch McConnell,
known unaffectionately by his detractors as "The Turtle" -- Bitesfromedwin sometimes seemed to be the only voice outraged by McConnell's 2010 pronouncement that he saw his Number One job leading the Senate's G.O.P. to be making Barack Obama a 1-term president.
Well, finally, a prominent voice has picked up the Clarion Call.
REJOICE, AND BE GLAD IN IT: Thomas Friedman speaks out, on this very item.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/opinion/friedman-hope-and-change-part-two.html?_r=0
TIME FOR BITESFROMEDWIN TO SHUT DOWN? MISSION ACCOMPLISHED?
HARDLY:
Yesterday, McConnell's counterpart in the House of Representatives, G.O.P.
Majority Leader John Boehner of Ohio, showed that Obama's victory on Tuesday made no difference to him. Lovely Republican defiance.
Will Congressional Republicans behave as they have since Jan. 2009?
On taxes, about deficits, about the national debt?
Don't cut taxes on the rich by one penny.
Balance our national budget on the backs of the middle and lower class.
Cut as many entitlements as possible.
Don't touch bloated military spending.
Don't touch the wealthy's huge fortunes.
HERE WE GO.
Faithful readers of Bitesfromedwin will remember one strand in particular, during the long buildup since all the way back to last January, up to Nov. 6's election:
U.S. Senator from Kentucky and Senate Minority Leader for the Republicans, Mitch McConnell,
known unaffectionately by his detractors as "The Turtle" -- Bitesfromedwin sometimes seemed to be the only voice outraged by McConnell's 2010 pronouncement that he saw his Number One job leading the Senate's G.O.P. to be making Barack Obama a 1-term president.
Well, finally, a prominent voice has picked up the Clarion Call.
REJOICE, AND BE GLAD IN IT: Thomas Friedman speaks out, on this very item.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/opinion/friedman-hope-and-change-part-two.html?_r=0
TIME FOR BITESFROMEDWIN TO SHUT DOWN? MISSION ACCOMPLISHED?
HARDLY:
Yesterday, McConnell's counterpart in the House of Representatives, G.O.P.
Majority Leader John Boehner of Ohio, showed that Obama's victory on Tuesday made no difference to him. Lovely Republican defiance.
Will Congressional Republicans behave as they have since Jan. 2009?
On taxes, about deficits, about the national debt?
Don't cut taxes on the rich by one penny.
Balance our national budget on the backs of the middle and lower class.
Cut as many entitlements as possible.
Don't touch bloated military spending.
Don't touch the wealthy's huge fortunes.
HERE WE GO.
Monday, November 5, 2012
On the Eve of Blackmail Victory: Sheep's Clothing
Mon. Nov. 6, 2012:
A fair-minded loved one from Redondo received the following "balanced" if unenthusiastic endorsement of Mitt Romney for president. It arrived here in Boston, where the 6 o'clock news on all major networks are currently showing pro-GOP ads over Democratic ads at what appears to be a 5-to-1 ratio.
If ads matter in Boston, Romney/Ryan will win New Hampshire, and Scott Brown will keep Ted Kennedy's U.S. Senate seat representing Massachusetts.
Here's the Romney endorsement:
http://www.tylernewton.com
And here's my reply:
A fair-minded loved one from Redondo received the following "balanced" if unenthusiastic endorsement of Mitt Romney for president. It arrived here in Boston, where the 6 o'clock news on all major networks are currently showing pro-GOP ads over Democratic ads at what appears to be a 5-to-1 ratio.
If ads matter in Boston, Romney/Ryan will win New Hampshire, and Scott Brown will keep Ted Kennedy's U.S. Senate seat representing Massachusetts.
Here's the Romney endorsement:
http://www.tylernewton.com
And here's my reply:
Compared to Tea Party rants, this seems indeed relatively balanced & fair, and relatively enjoyable to read.
However: Maybe it is a measure of how frustrated Bitesfromedwin has become with despicable GOP tactics, that this blog does not agree with it.
In fact, at this point, Bites sees it as Fair-mindedness in Sheep's Clothing -- far more dangerous in misleading people than right-wing extremists' junk.
In fact, at this point, Bites sees it as Fair-mindedness in Sheep's Clothing -- far more dangerous in misleading people than right-wing extremists' junk.
Let me give just one example:
The writer seems willfully blind to experts' assessments about Romney's tax plan, which the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center demonstrated as patently false! This annoyed the GOP so much, that they got GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell ["My #1 goal as Senate Minority Leader is to make Obama a one-term president!"] to get the TPC report thrown out!
Sometimes, baloney gets packaged as nonpartisan reasonableness.
This surfaced in the 1st Obama/Romney Debate.
This surfaced in the 1st Obama/Romney Debate.
Note Romney's technique [it can disqualify you in formal debating] called "Spreading":
"Romney used a debate technique called Spreading. Climate deniers and creationists use it to cram falsehoods as arguments into what sounds like a rational discussion. In a classic debating competition, spreading is illegal and gets you disqualified from a debating match. Spreading is purposeful lying by flooding or dominating a debate with false information based on a rational statement. The faster your argument is presented, the less people can respond. The points are short and nonspecific and don't add up. The listener and moderator literally can't follow what the person is saying to even get their arms around the message to respond. The person then dives in again very quickly with more. It's a way for a less intelligent person to appear smart. I've worked with climate scientists on how to respond to such mind-numbing claptrap. The other name for it is a Gish Gallop. Duane Gish who was a creationist came up with it to argue with science. Talk over the other person with your lie, as if it's the truth. Fox News was built on it."
In my perhaps by-now warped-by-frustration opinion, the Tyler Newton endorsement of Romney, above, is ingenuous at best, and "spreading" at worst.
"Romney used a debate technique called Spreading. Climate deniers and creationists use it to cram falsehoods as arguments into what sounds like a rational discussion. In a classic debating competition, spreading is illegal and gets you disqualified from a debating match. Spreading is purposeful lying by flooding or dominating a debate with false information based on a rational statement. The faster your argument is presented, the less people can respond. The points are short and nonspecific and don't add up. The listener and moderator literally can't follow what the person is saying to even get their arms around the message to respond. The person then dives in again very quickly with more. It's a way for a less intelligent person to appear smart. I've worked with climate scientists on how to respond to such mind-numbing claptrap. The other name for it is a Gish Gallop. Duane Gish who was a creationist came up with it to argue with science. Talk over the other person with your lie, as if it's the truth. Fox News was built on it."
In my perhaps by-now warped-by-frustration opinion, the Tyler Newton endorsement of Romney, above, is ingenuous at best, and "spreading" at worst.
To reward the GOP with a Romney endorsement is nothing less than giving in to 4 years of blackmail.
I know, I know -- this is Paul Krugman again. But his words almost exactly describe & explain the biggest reason why Tyler Newton's "fair-minded" endorsement of Romney is frustrating in the extreme.
By the way, as I write this, Romney ads, and Scott Brown ads, in sheer numbers, are absolutely
creaming Obama's & Elizabeth Warren's spots.
You can thank the Supreme Court's notorious 5-4 Citizens United ruling of 2010 for enabling wealthy Republicans like Sheldon Adelson & the Koch Brothers to buy control of our federal government. And if Hollywood had as much money & power, then Citizens United would have bought the election for Obama & Elizabeth Warren.
It totally sucks.
And back to the language of Tyner Newton's "endorsement": "Does the Obama/Romney choice even matter?"
Well, in foreign affairs, consider how we are still trying to dig ourselves out of the consequences of GWB's neo-con "Get Saddam Hussein for Daddy Bush" war -- which also made us shift our focus in March 2003 from a nearly defeated Taliban in Afghanistan.
And, in domestic affairs, consider how GWB's policy of economic deregulation at home enabled the obscene housing bubble & crash, with full Big Bank & Wall Street collusion, while the SEC stood cluelessly & toothlessly by, and federal rating agencies like Moody's, and Standard & Poor, not only stood by, but actually gave Triple-AAA ratings to wildly inflated housing mortgage junk bonds!
That's why, for me, the "Tyler Newton" endorsement is fair-mindedness-in-sheep's-clothing.
It is a difficult pill to swallow -- as "balanced" as it seems.
Also, one has to consider the source.
It is a difficult pill to swallow -- as "balanced" as it seems.
Also, one has to consider the source.
Will a reader fill us in? Who IS "Tyler Newton"? He appears to be a young businessman. He calls his
business-oriented blog "The Dynamist."
business-oriented blog "The Dynamist."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)