Thursday, January 31, 2013

"We, the People": The REAL Gun Villains?

Thu. Jan. 31, 2013:


Well, folks, the REAL "Bad Guys" -- made famous by Wayne LaPierre [the CEO of the NRA] --  turn out to be both the bad guys with guns AND the good guys with guns.  The latter, with rare exceptions, just have to cry "2nd Amendment."  They might as well cry "Wolf," but it's probably enough to defeat any meaningful Gun Safety Reform.  

Read, and weep.  If you're too busy for 5 items, then just read #1 & #3:


1.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/nyregion/activists-seek-repeal-of-new-yorks-gun-control-laws.html
NY State gun rights people believe the robo-calls they receive from the NRA:  "Organize, before Obama's gun-grabbing takes your 2nd Amendment away!"

2.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/28/opinion/the-politics-behind-the-guns-debate.html
"Perhaps I am completely naive about politics, but this article did not even mention the possibility that one of our elected representatives might vote his or her conscience on this issue.  It seems clear that at least some of our representatives believe that our current lack of gun limitations is unconscionable, but evidently less important than re-election.  The National Rifle Association mocks common sense, ginning up false arguments to appease its base and stay in business.  Do our representatives in Washington act any differently?"


3.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/us/strict-chicago-gun-laws-cant-stem-fatal-shots.html?pagewanted=all
A horrifying account of how so many guns accumulate in Chicago for more than 500 Chicago gun deaths
in 1 year -- despite strict gun laws within Chicago.

4.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/28/opinion/confessions-of-a-liberal-gun-owner.html?pagewanted=all
A hurricane changed novelist Justin Cronin's mind, to favor owning firearms.  But he still ridicules the NRA.

5.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/opinion/nocera-and-in-last-weeks-gun-news.html  
Joe Nocero's individualized list of one week's gun casualties around the USA.



Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Food for Thought: Photos, Guns, and Elections

Tues. Jan. 29, 2013:

Faithful Readers, today you get rewarded with 2 photographs that should get an award,
plus 2 articles about what happens about guns after the funerals & TV trucks are over,
and 2 articles about improving elections to Give Bipartisanship A Chance.

1.  The classic photographs:


                           An adoring crowd with the Obamas at the Youth Ball, Jan. 20, 2009




Hillary Clinton Spars With Senators [Like Rand Paul!] Over Benghazi



2.  What happens about guns, long after the funerals & TV trucks are gone?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/25/opinion/auroras-suffering-beyond-the-spotlight.html?_r=0
Untold suffering for the rest of their damaged lives, which the media does not cover.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/keeping-guns-away-from-children/
The astounding number of Americans who keep loaded guns unlocked in their homes!



3.  Bipartisanship & Election Systems are a Joke in the Good Old U.S.A.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/2853243601.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Dec+30%2C+2012&author=&pub=Boston+Globe&edition=&startpage=K.9&desc=Bipartisan+bright+spots%2C+met+with+derision
Virtually no incentive for bipartisanship in Congress, because of our divisive representative system!

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/21/opinion/how-to-fix-a-broken-election-system.html
At least 3 steps that Obama & Congress can take, to make voting easier and reduce the role of big money.



Monday, January 28, 2013

Federal Bureaucrats DO Screw Up, Over & Over

Mon. Jan. 28, 2013:


The New York Times ran 2 stories on its 1st page of the Business Section, and BOTH show breathtaking incompetence by federal agencies.  On this, Republicans have a point.  It is only fair that the NYT reports these items:

1.  http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/23/financial-crisis-lawsuit-suggests-bad-behavior-at-morgan-stanley/



Morgan Stanley, the huge investment banking firm, played the Feds like a fiddle.  It was a complete mismatch.  Thanks to government incompetence, Morgan Stanley wrecked millions around the country and the planet, and suffered virtually no penalty.

2.   http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/24/business/global/boeing-787-battery-was-not-overcharged-japanese-investigators-say.html?_r=0


The Federal Aviation Administration gave Boeing's "Dreamliner" 787 airplanes a complete pass,
and now those planes' lithium batteries are causing fires all over the place.
This story updates the old saying, "Not Bad For Government Work."
Because this IS Bad Government Work.


Friday, January 25, 2013

When Will Someone Expose Specious NRA?

Fri. Jan. 25, 2013:

No Obama proposals are violating the 2nd Amendment, NOR the Supreme Court's Heller ruling.
Can someone definitively put this NRA nonsense to rest?



Australia could show us the way:
Former PM -- "I Went After Guns.  Obama Can Too."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/opinion/australia-banned-assault-weapons-america-can-too.html?_r=0

                                         Australia's Former Prime Minister John Howard

More Signs that a 21st Century Ft. Sumter Looms

Fri. Jan. 25, 2013:

From Texas, most notably, we currently hear talk of presidential impeachment and secession.
It is 1859-style rhetoric, if not 1860-style.
We shall see how long it continues.

Meanwhile, here are 2 more signs, beyond Texas Talk:

1.  Armed "volunteers" -- in marked police cars -- are now patrolling schools.
This is a continuing process of vigilante behavior from Sheriff Joe Arpaio's "immigration patrol posse" of Maricopa County, Arizona.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/us/arizona-sheriff-adds-school-patrols-to-posses-duties.html



2.  The Texas Attorney General is spending some of his extra super-pac money to run ads urging New Yorkers to flee their state for Texas, where new gun-control laws like New York's will not happen any time soon.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/us/texas-attorney-general-invites-new-yorkers-to-bring-their-guns.html




Saturday, January 19, 2013

It's HERE! And Neither I Nor A of A Is In It!

Sat. Jan. 19, 2013:

Honest, you can check the Index, you can check the table of contents.
But you may want to take a closer look at the Author . . .


Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Storm Bill? A Good Gun Owner? Torture & Osama?

Tues. Jan. 16, 2013:

Today, 3 different subjects.

1.  Take a close look at our Congress's legislative legerdemain -- i.e. sausage-making -- in its work on
a Storm Bill for NJ & NY after Hurricane Sandy:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/14/nyregion/house-to-take-up-sandy-relief-bill-amid-battle-over-spending.html

[Maybe the Brits and/or the Chinese get things done better than our democratic republic?]


2.   One almost sympathizes with  western-New York gun rights advocates.
But the operative word is "almost."
Fuming at New York State's latest gun control laws, the coach of a high school rifle team says:

"It would outlaw most of the guns we shoot . . . What's so frustrating is the people who are here obeying the law are the ones who pay all the prices when these crazy things [Newtown, Aurora, etc.] happen."
[But the law they are "obeying" is buying guns that represent a hobby, not a necessity; bear-bating used to be legal, too, but that didn't mean you HAD to bear-bait just because it was your preferred hobby.]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/14/nyregion/upstate-new-york-gun-owners-cast-a-cold-eye-on-new-laws.html
Popular Hobbies Over Time:  Bear-Baiting, and Target-Shooting With AR-15's & 30-Round Magazines

3.  Hollywood's current controversial film, Zero Dark Thirty, could easilly have sidestepped incredulity.
All it had to do was avoid suggesting that waterboarding & other torture yielded key details of Osama bin Laden's whereabouts.'
No one questions the right of story-tellers to narrate fiction -- even when spinning out renditions of actual historical events.  But when they deviate from known fact, are they not under an obligation to say so?
Otherwise, the effect is to deceive millions of gullible movie-viewers.

Get a load of the following rationalization, defending the film-makers' deviation from the truth: 

[From Neal Gabler, "Hard facts vs. big truths: Do artists have an obligation to get history right in films?"
in the Boston Globe, Sat. Jan. 12, 2013]

"Reporters and historians necessarily deal with facts, whether or not they also deal with truth.  We read them to learn what happened.  Artists don't necessarily deal with facts, even when they are purporting to show us history.  An artist's highest obligation isn't to 'getting it right.'  His or her obligation is to making us think, feel, and understand.


"Frankly, facts are immaterial to this mission, though we may need the distance of time to appreciate that.  No one would possibly chide Shakespeare for not being entirely faithful to the facts of Antony and Cleopatra or Henry IV or Henry V.  No one would scream that Falstaff was a fabrication.  That's because everyone understands that Shakespeare wasn't reporting facts.  He was finding truths, which is the very thing that makes him one of the great artists of all time.  Some 500 years later the facts don't seem to matter.  The art does."
_________________________________________________________________________________

DEAR READERS, WHAT IS WRONG WITH NEAL GABLER'S ARGUMENT, WHEN APPLIED TO ZERO DARK THIRTY'S SUGGESTION THAT "TORTURE HELPED FIND OSAMA BIN LADEN"?




Tuesday, January 15, 2013

GUNS, FLU, AND POGO

Tues. Jan. 15, 2013:

Hello out there.
Is there anyone who can convince me that -- with rare exceptions FOR genuinely threatened & vulnerable individuals -- owning even a single gun is not fatally dumb?
Consider:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/12/opinion/nocera-how-to-shoot-a-gun.html



Is possessing a gun as dumb, or dumber, than not getting a flu shot?
Many pass on the flu shot, and struggle to explain why.

http://epaper.bostonglobe.com/epaper/viewer.aspx




BITESFROMEDWIN'S SAD GROWL OF AN ANSWER:  

THESE ANTI-FLU-SHOT AMERICANS ARE BLEEPING LAZY, SELF-ABSORBED, AND BREATHTAKINGLY STUPID -- JUST LIKE THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF USA's GUN-OWNERS.
AND THE DYSFUNCTIONAL CONGRESS WE NOW WITNESS DAILY IS EXACTLY WHAT OUR IDIOTIC PUBLIC DESERVES.  And the rest of us suffer, mostly in overwhelmed silence.





"WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY, AND HE IS US."
                                                                                 -- Walt Kelly's Pogo, 1952-53 ff.   



Monday, January 14, 2013

Beware All Simple Solutions: Still . . .

Mon. Jan. 14, 2013:


Dear Readers,
Maybe y'all know long-retired columnist Charlie Reese, of the Orlando Sentinel.  I do not.



Maybe he has a looney right-wing track record.  The webmeister claims it is "neither anti-democratic nor anti-republican."  [Should it trouble us that the webmeister should have spelled it "anti-Democratic
nor anti-Republican"?  More illiteracy.]
Google has Charlie Reese sandwiched among countless cartoons favoring Tea Party views.

Beware of simple solutions.

Still, there is something compelling about what the web is purporting to be Charlie Reese's Final Column, from way back in 2001.

I share it here, and welcome your commentary:

                                                 

                                                    Psssst, Charlie:  Including Veep, 546?



http://www.blacklistednews.com/Charlie_Reese's_Final_Column/20504/0/38/38/Y/M.html








Friday, January 11, 2013

Hey, Someone in the NYT Agrees with Bites!

Fri. Jan. 11, 2013:


Dear Worthies,
Finally -- proof that you have not been wasting your time reading this blog.  At least, not totally.

Please note the following letter to the editors of the NYT, printed yesterday, Thu. Jan. 10, 2013:





Re “After Pinpointing Gun Owners, Paper Is a Target” (front page, Jan. 7):
Am I the only person confused by the inconsistent reasoning of America’s most vociferous pro-gun supporters? Since the tragedy in Newtown, Conn., pro-gun activists have insisted that “bad” people with guns would stay away from places where they knew that “good” people, too, had guns. Thus they advise arming the “good” people.
But now we learn from the president of the Westchester County Firearms Owners Association that its members are “really upset” with a local newspaper that published public records identifying the names and addresses of the area’s presumably “good” gun owners, and that those identified are “afraid for their families.”
Huh? If “bad” people with guns will be deterred by knowing which “good” people also have guns, shouldn’t identifying them assure the “good” ones of more safety, not less?


And speaking of safety, how come those “really upset” gun owners are threatening to destroy the incomes of, and even to shoot, the owners and employees of the offending newspaper? I thought they were supposed to be the “good” people. Maybe that’s the problem in America these days. It’s so hard to tell the “good” people from the “bad” ones.
JUDY BALABAN
Beverly Hills, Calif., Jan. 7, 2013













Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Why Are Legal Gun Owners So Touchy?

Tues. January 8, 2013:

Dear Worthy Readers,
Could someone please explain to me why legally licensed, permit-owning Gun Owners are so touchy about being outed by a tiny suburban newspaper?  Certainly, Texas gun owners don't worry:



First, the NRA declined to comment for days after the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown.  Then, at its press conference a week later, they told the press they would not take any questions after their spokesman Wayne LaPierre's prepared statement.

And now, legal permit owners are going ballistic after The Journal News -- a tiny suburban daily, out of White Plains and West Nyack, north of NYC.  Two weeks ago, the paper published names and addresses of handgun permit holders -- a total of 33,614 -- in two suburban counties, Westchester and Rockland, and put maps of their locations online.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/nyregion/after-pinpointing-gun-owners-journal-news-is-a-target.html?pagewanted=all



My question is, Why the outrage?!?  Why not be proud of your Supreme Court-interpreted 2nd Amendment right to keep & bear arms?  ARE YOU ASHAMED OF BEING OUTED FOR LEGALLY OWNING A PERMIT FOR A PISTOL?

If so, this alone should tell us something.  In this case, owners claim that bad-guys will now stake out their homes, in order to steal their fire-arms.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/01/burglars-say-gun-maps-posted-at-journal-news-makes-the-job-easier-safer/
[TALK ABOUT "HAVING IT BOTH WAYS"!  Alice in Wonderland, anyone?]

But wouldn't the adage of NRA's Wayne LaPierre kick in?  Wouldn't "bad guys with a gun" be afraid to burgle the homes of "good guys with a gun"?  Here is the take of NRA sympathizers, after they sent anonymous threats from around the country:



Here is the Boston Globe's editorial from Jan. 5,
entitled "Gun Permit Map Stirs Furor, But Public Discussion Needed":

The most reasonable critique of the newspaper is that the map doesn't present a complete picture of the extent of gun ownership in Westchester and Rockland counties.  After all, a permit holder might own multiple pistols, or none at all.  The map doesn't include rifles or shotguns, which don't require permits in New York, and doesn't account for illegally held weapons.

But just because the Journal News's report could have been done differently doesn't mean it shouldn't have been done at all.  The newspaper has acted within its journalistic mission.  New York's pistol permits are a public record.  Many residents would undoubtedly like to know if they are living next to a gun owner, but lack the time to file a public record request.  The more broadly the names of permit holders are known, the more likely someone is to notice if a dangerous individual was mistakenly granted one.  The presence of guns in a home is also a public health risk factor that individual parents, for instance, may wish to weigh; while many gun owners sincerely believe themselves to be protecting themselves and their families, studies show a correlation between gun ownership and death by gun.

The objection of gun owners, aside from the concern that they are being stigmatized . . . 




AGAIN, MY QUESTION IS, WHY DO THEY FEEL STIGMATIZED?  AREN'T THEY PROUD OF EXERCISING THEIR "2ND AMENDMENT RIGHT"?  NEWTOWN'S MASSACRE SEEMS TO HAVE CONVERTED THEM INTO TOUCHIES!  DON'T YOU WONDER WHY, TOO?




Tuesday, January 1, 2013

G.O.P. Faults Obama for Fiscal Handoff to Biden

Tues. Jan. 1, 2013:

Dear Worthies,
A Republican friend just emailed me, blaming President Obama for turning to Vice-president Joe Biden
at the 11th hour of Fiscal Cliff negotiations with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

But a Democratic voice [oops, sorry, a "Democrat friend"], retorts with the following:



I knew that Republicans would immediately ridicule Obama for turning over the final "Cliff" negotions to Biden.  
They're doing it right now, as I write this, on Fox News.
But if you or I were Obama, we probably would have done the same thing.  
And under the circumstances, you or I would have been shrewd to do so.


 
Boehner, Graham, Kantor, McCain, McConnell, Ryan all DESPISE Obama as a person, and he knows it.  If you must go to the dance, you need a willing dance partner.  

Obama is NOT a "pol" like the rest of them, nor a charmer like FDR or 
Dixon, Illinois' own Ronnie Reagan [there's ONE good politician from Illinois!].  
Obama doesn't like the phony lubrication that "pols" have to do, and opponents & even allies see that as arrogant elitism.
Obama has led when it comes to USA beginning to include black people & gays & latinas into high-level decision-making.  
Obama has led when it comes to a Newtown mourning speech, as Clinton did after Oklahoma Citiy & Bush did at the World Trade Center.  
Obama has led when it comes to even more aggressive droning of Al Qaeda & risking the Osama bin Laden raid -- more than what 
VICE-PRESIDENT CHENEY puppeteered GWB to do.  
Obama has led when it comes to finding the aides that design a brilliant campaign ground-game.
  
But, does Obama's arsenal of "leadership skills" include glad-handing with individual Congressmen?  
Fuggeddabbouttit.  He doesn't even seem to have any personal friends.  
Bill, as we know, had too many friends -- putting stains on their blue dresses, and pardoning low-lifes at the end of his term.

Obama knows he's no good at this political Oil.  He knows GOP pols loathe him for lacking it.  
He knows that Biden has been doing the Capitol Hill grease thing for 40 years, and JOE's chances of getting some resolution are infinitely better for gazillions of American taxpayers & wounded veterans & indebted students than Barack's social-turn-off manner EVER would -- unless Barack just lay down & gave them everything they asked for -- which he already did on the Debt Ceiling and Global Warming and Immigration and countless other Tea Party sacred cows. 
[Not that he's alone!  Any Republicans, fer chrissakes, who stood up to the Tea Party got Lugared!]
And Obama surely knows that Republicans will have a field-day criticizing his handoff to Uncle Joe, at a critical moment.
But he was willing to take the inevitable FoxNoise hit, to increase many-fold the chances at a least-bad deal for millions of struggling citizens.  And yes, the deal we now have SUX -- mostly another gift to extremist blackmail from both Right & Left.  [See Nate Silver's
article -- again.]

What were Obama's options to using Joe Biden?
1.  To get NOTHING -- from an abusive Mitch McConnell [who in 2010 had announced that the 1 priority he had for HIS leadership style was to make Obama a 1-term president!  How can anyone deal with a guy like that, in a system like ours!].  Senator McConnell is, of course, up for reelection in 2014 from a rabidly right-wing Kentucky.  McConnell, Obama, and Reid were getting no where for the country's economy except the looming Cliff:  sudden, draconian fiscal measures designed months ago by dug-in ideologue Republicans, deft at political blackmail,
2.  OR, Obama could take a 24-hour Dale Carnegie course in the art of Good Ol' Boy charm, and cave, giving McConnell everything down to his underwear, so that Mitch wouldn't get Primaried in 2014.  [See Nate Silver's article.]

You may recall that in January or February of 2009, the Obamas made clumsy, early efforts to have a bunch of GOP leadership to the White House for one Big Lunch.  And right there is an example of Obama's "leadership personality" problem:  He is clearly not good at the daily FDR/LBJ arm-twisting, or Clinton flattering & schmoozing, so those Jan. 2009 reach-outs took the form of a Big Lunch, rather than Jefferson's weekly or monthly small dinners at Monticello -- where seating was "pell-mell" with no one at the head of the table, and with rotating guest-lists.]  GOP "leadership's" constituents have demanded that, if they don't want to be Primaried by Tea Parties, financed with Koch Brothers' money, they better keep heaping abuse on that goddamn Muslim Socialist [read 'black guy named Hussein," who's "not like us"].  It's a little hard to negotiate with folks who have been fear-mongering & filibustering every single appointment you make, every single bill you propose -- since Jan. 20, 2009!  Pelosi gets blamed for rushing through Obamacare without "consulting" GOP leadership, during that short window when Dems had a filibuster-proof Senate & a House majority.  [Y'know what those "consultations" would have done:  Kill the bill, with huge A.M.A. and Insurance Industry pressure -- just like Hillarycare.]

  
Lincoln, FDR, LBJ, Reagan & Tip O'Neill, even as recently as Bill Clinton -- NONE of them has faced the maniacal, polarized talk-radio-fueled opposition facing the Black Muslim Socialist named Barack Hussein Obama.  When the South seceded, Lincoln only had to maneuver with
Democratic Unionists.  The "Secesh" crazies were all gone.  In 1994-5, all Clinton had to do, in facing Newt & the crazy Contract With America guys, was to stand aside, and let them close down the government & impeach him and thereby self-destruct with reliable Republican overreach.